The resorption of vital and devitalized bone in vitro: significance for bone grafts.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10024385.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Several studies have suggested that devitalized bone is less satisfactory than live tissue for surgical grafting purposes because an initial resorption step, prior to new formation, is lacking. We have compared the osteoclastic resorption of cultured bone containing living osteocytes with that of similar bone in which the osteocytes were dead. In experiment I, transverse slices cut from freshly harvested adult rabbit femora were either placed in phosphate buffered saline (Set 1) or subjected to freezing and thawing (Set 2). In experiment II, a heated set (Set 3) was prepared in addition. All slices were cultured with osteoclasts for 24 hours, eight slices per set being seeded with bone cells in experiment I and three per set in experiment II. The areas and volumes of resorption pits formed during the culture period were measured using reflection confocal microscopy. In both experiments, the mean values for the areas of the pits were smaller in the bone containing live osteocytes (P < 0.03, Mann Whitney test), and in experiment II the volumes of the pits in Set 1 were smaller than those in Set 3 (P < 0. 0001, Mann Whitney test). However, in neither experiment was there a significant difference between the Sets in the volume:area ratios (mean depths) of the pits. The findings show that devitalized bone is resorbed by osteoclasts at least as readily as bone containing vital osteocytes in vitro, and indicate that if grafted devitalized bone resorbs less well in vivo it is not because the bone tissue is intrinsically resistant to osteoclastic resorption.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Resorption
- Bone Transplantation
- Femur
- Graft Survival