Monocanalicular lesions: to reconstruct or not.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10406612.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the success rate of a simple surgical method for the treatment of a monocanalicular lacrimal lesion. Retrospective noncomparative case series. Thirteen consecutive patients with monocanalicular trauma who were seen from August 1995 to March 1998. In six patients, the canaliculus was lacerated as a result of an external injury and in seven patients as a result of tumor removal (iatrogenic injury). Reapproximation of the orbicularis muscle and skin overlying the torn canaliculus without reanastomosis of the lacerated canaliculus. In those patients in whom the canaliculus was sacrificed as part of the removal of an eyelid tumor, no attempt was made to reconstruct the canaliculus. Symptomatology, patency of the lacrimal passage, fluorescein dye disappearance test, and patient satisfaction. In all patients the injured canaliculus was totally blocked, but despite this none of the patients complained of inconvenient tearing either indoors or outdoors. The ipsilateral unharmed canaliculus was functioning normally in such a way that the fluorescein dye instillation test showed residual dye in six patients after 2 minutes and in none of the patients after 5 minutes. All patients were satisfied with the functional and cosmetic result. Nonrepair of a monocanalicular lesion is a valid approach that results in little or no morbidity.
Medical subject headings
- Eye Injuries
- Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases
- Nasolacrimal Duct
- Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures