Stability of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral occipital condyle resection: a biomechanical study.

Vishteh, A G; Crawford, N R; Melton, M S; Spetzler, R F; Sonntag, V K; Dickman, C A · J Neurosurg · 1999

biomechanical · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

The authors sought to determine the biomechanics of the occipitoatlantal (occiput [Oc]-C1) and atlantoaxial (C1-2) motion segments after unilateral gradient condylectomy. Six human cadaveric specimens (skull with attached upper cervical spine) underwent nondestructive biomechanical testing (physiological loads) during flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Axial translation from tension to compression was also studied across Oc-C2. Each specimen served as its own control and underwent baseline testing in the intact state. The specimens were then tested after progressive unilateral condylectomy (25% resection until completion), which was performed using frameless stereotactic guidance. At Oc-C1 for all motions that were tested, mobility increased significantly compared to baseline after a 50% condylectomy. Flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation increased 15.3%, 40.8%, and 28.1%, respectively. At C1-2, hypermobility during flexion-extension occurred after a 25% condylectomy, during axial rotation after 75% condylectomy, and during lateral bending after a 100% condylectomy. Resection of 50% or more of the occipital condyle produces statistically significant hypermobility at Oc-C1. After a 75% resection, the biomechanics of the Oc-C1 and C1-2 motion segments change considerably. Performing fusion of the craniovertebral junction should therefore be considered if half or more of one occipital condyle is resected.

Medical subject headings