Comparison of episcleral plaque and proton beam radiation therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10442907.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy of iodine-125 (125I) and ruthenium-106 (106Ru) episcleral plaque radiation therapy and proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) in the treatment of choroidal melanoma. A retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study. Charts of patients treated with 125I, 106Ru, and PBRT for choroidal melanoma between January 1988 and June 1996 at St. Bartholomew's Hospital and Moorfields Eye Hospitals were reviewed. Local control of choroidal melanomas after 125I, 106Ru, or PBRT. A total of 597 patients were identified (125I = 190, 106Ru = 140, PBRT = 267). Patients treated with 106Ru had a significantly greater risk of local tumor recurrence than did patients treated with either 125I (P = 0.0133; confidence interval [CI], 1.26-7.02; risk ratio, 2.97) or PBRT (P = 0.0097; CI, 1.30-6.66; risk ratio, 2.94). A stepwise Cox proportional hazard model found maximal basal diameter to be a significant covariate (P = 0.0033). Patients treated with 106Ru had a significantly greater risk of local tumor recurrence than did those patients treated with either 125I or PBRT.
Medical subject headings
- Brachytherapy
- Choroid Neoplasms
- Iodine Radioisotopes
- Melanoma
- Radiotherapy, High-Energy
- Ruthenium Radioisotopes