Comparison of isokinetic peak force and work parameters in youth with and without mental retardation.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10449023.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare isokinetic knee (flexion and extension) strength of nondisabled youth (ND; 15 males, 15 females; males = 12.7 +/- 2 yr; females = 13.4 +/- 2 yr) and youths with mental retardations (MR, 17 males + 13 females; male = 14.7 +/- 2 yr; females = 13.6 +/- 2 yr). Subjects were evaluated on a Kin-Con isokinetic dynamometer at a speed of 60 degrees x s(-1). Parameters measured were peak torque (PT), time to PT, angle of PT, total work (W), and PT hamstrings/quadriceps (HQ) ratio. Peak torque was also corrected by weight (BW) and body mass index (BMI). Peak torque, time to peak torque, angle of peak torque, and total work were analyzed using a 2 x 2 x 2 (groups x gender x muscle) repeated measures analysis of variance (MANOVA). Flexion/extension ratios, BMI, and BW were analyzed by separate 2 x 2 (group x gender) analyses of variance. Results of this study suggest that: 1) while gender differences are apparent in the ND population they are not evident in individuals with MR; 2) knee extension strength is higher for ND youth, thus causing lower PT HQ ratios when compared with those in youth with MR; 3) angle of PT and time to PT were similar among groups; and 4) total work performed is lower in individuals with MR. It was concluded that parameters of strength production in individuals with MR are not consistent and do not follow the same pattern as their nonretarded peers.
Medical subject headings
- Intellectual Disability
- Knee Joint
- Muscle, Skeletal