Alteration of interferential current and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation frequency: effects on nerve excitation.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10489010.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To investigate the effects of different interferential current (IC) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) frequencies on sensory, motor, and pain thresholds. Single blind, repeated measures design. Laboratory. Women students 18 to 30 years old (n = 24). Premodulated IC and square-wave TENS pulses (125micros phase duration) were applied over the median nerve at a range of frequencies in all subjects. The peak current (in milliamperes) was recorded twice at each threshold for each frequency, and averaged. Both IC and TENS displayed a statistically significant effect of frequency for each threshold. However, frequency effects with IC were not well defined and were of small magnitude. Pure 4kHz current (0Hz amplitude modulated frequency) with IC did not produce effects different from those produced when an amplitude modulated frequency was included. With TENS, frequency effects were very clearly observed, with a distinct increase in the current intensity at each threshold as frequency decreased. It is postulated that the medium frequency component of IC is the main parameter in stimulation, contrary to traditional claims of the amplitude modulated frequency being important. TENS was shown to be a more adaptable method of stimulating these nerve pathways than IC.
Medical subject headings
- Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation