The reason for confining the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma to the investigational setting.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10516382.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma has been the subject of many studies. Most studies have been nonrandomized and therefore by definition inconclusive. In addition, most of the 14 performed randomized studies have had small sample sizes. A meta-analysis on the data of these 14 studies suggested a possible survival improvement, albeit not significant. The outcome of the meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution in view of the fact that in 18% of patients, histology data were lacking; ineligibility rates in included studies were high; central pathology was not uniformly performed; and in 6% of patients, sarcomas other than soft tissue sarcomas were included. Because it is generally recommended that meta-analyses of small randomized trials are used only to generate hypotheses for more reliable randomized trials, it is argued that adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas should remain confined to the investigational setting.
Medical subject headings
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Doxorubicin
- Sarcoma
- Soft Tissue Neoplasms