Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: errors made by pre-hospital emergency medical personnel.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10524730.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the CPR techniques of emergency healthcare professionals (emergency medical technicians, firemen, emergency first responders, CPR instructors). Skills were evaluated using a Laerdal Skillmeter Manikin, which provided a computerized printout of the quantifiable data during the CPR sequence. All of the 66 subjects in the study had completed a recertification course within the last 2 years (mean = 0.86 +/- 0.18, 95% CI). The sequence was videotaped for later viewing and for correlating the errors with the data. In addition, the participants were required to fill in a questionnaire. The most frequently occurring errors were observed in landmarking, overcompression, palpating a carotid pulse and insufficient ventilation. Although 98.5% of participants made an attempt to landmark their position for compression on the sternum, 35.9% of the total compressions performed by all subjects were incorrectly positioned on the patient's chest. Overcompression of the patient's chest accounted for 55.3% of incorrect compressions. Although 94% of participants attempted to verify a carotid pulse, only 45% were able to feel it and therefore stop performing cardiac massage. Of the total ventilations, 49% were below the American Heart Association (AHA) recommended minimum (800 ml). The results of this study showed a high rate of errors occurring in the CPR provided by emergency healthcare professionals.
Medical subject headings
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Clinical Competence
- Emergency Medical Services
- Medical Errors