Biliary dilatation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes--value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10644119.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine the value of conventional T1 - and T2-weighted images and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) images as a supplement to MR cholangiopancreatographic (MRCP) images in differentiation of benign from malignant causes of biliary dilatation. MR studies in 62 patients with biliary dilatation with proved causes included conventional T1- and less heavily T2-weighted images, as well as gadolinium-enhanced dynamic images and heavily T2-weighted MRCP images. Two radiologists reviewed MRCP images alone, MRCP images with nonenhanced T1 - and T2-weighted MR images, and MRCP images with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic images. For differentiation of benign from malignant causes of biliary dilatation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) was significantly (P < .05) larger for MRCP images interpreted with T1 - and T2-weighted images (0.9547 for reader 1, 0.8404 for reader 2) than for MRCP images alone (0.8144 for reader 1, 0.8122 for reader 2). The addition of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR images to MRCP images with nonenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images did not significantly increase accuracy (A(z) = 0.9554 for reader 1 and 0.8650 for reader 2), but the level of confidence was increased in 17%-24% of cases. Use of nonenhanced T1- and less heavily T2-weighted images with MRCP images significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of MR examinations of pancreaticobiliary disease.
Medical subject headings
- Bile Duct Neoplasms
- Cholestasis, Extrahepatic
- Image Enhancement
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging