Comprehensive critical incident monitoring in a neonatal-pediatric intensive care unit: experience with the system approach.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10663283.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To examine the occurrence of critical incidents (CIs) in order to improve quality of care. Prospective survey. Multidisciplinary, neonatal-pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) of a non-university, teaching children's hospital. Four hundred and sixty-seven admissions over a 1-year period. A CI is any event which could have reduced, or did reduce, the safety margin for the patient. Comprehensive, anonymous, non-punitive CI monitoring was undertaken. CI severity with respect to actual patient harm was graded: major (score 3), moderate (2) or minor (1). The system approach incorporates the philosophy that errors are evidence of deficiencies in systems, not in people. We undertook 2-monthly analyses of CIs. There were 211 CI reports: 30 % major, 25 % moderate, 45 % minor. The CI categories were management/environment 29 %, drugs 29 %, procedures 18 %, respiration 14 %, equipment dysfunction 7 %, nosocomial infections 3 %. The respiratory CIs were the most severe, the drug-related CIs the least severe (score mean, SD: 2.9, 0.26 vs 1.4, 0.76; p < 0.001). However, 20 out of 62 drug-related CIs were potentially life-threatening. Thirteen percent of drug CIs were decimal point errors. Eleven of the 29 respiratory CIs were accidental extubations (2.6/100 ventilator days). CIs were most often precipitated by consultants (32 %), followed by residents (23 %, over-represented in drug CIs, 22/62) and specialized nurses (21 %). Doctors had a greater proportion of major CIs than nurses (p < 0.01). Fifty percent of the CIs were detected by routine checks. The most important method of detection was patient inspection (44 %), alarms accounted for only 10 %. Contributing factors were human errors (63 %), communication failure (14 %), organizational problems (10 %), equipment dysfunction (7 %) and milieu (3 %). CIs are very common in pediatric intensive care. Knowledge of them is a precious source for quality improvement through changes in the system.
Medical subject headings
- Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
- Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
- Medical Errors
- Task Performance and Analysis