Approaches to the sellar and parasellar region: a retrospective comparison of the endonasal-transsphenoidal and sublabial-transsphenoidal approaches.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10699812.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Tumors of the hypophysis are often managed surgically by the neurosurgeon and the otolaryngologist. Three widely used anterior routes to the sella are the endonasal (transcolumellar) transsphenoidal, sublabial transsphenoidal, and transethmoidal approaches. We reviewed the charts of 60 patients who underwent surgery, 42 transcolumellar and 18 sublabial, for sellar and parasellar adenomas and compared the two transsphenoidal approaches. None of the patients in our study underwent the transethmoidal approach. Furthermore, 26 of the patients underwent an extensive interview to assess postoperative progress. Clinically, neither approach had any significant complications, and none of the patients in either group reported significant postoperative morbidity. On the basis of these results, we believe there is minimal difference in patient subjective reports and objective morbidity when comparing the sublabial and transcolumellar approaches.
Medical subject headings
- Adenoma
- Craniopharyngioma
- Endoscopy
- Hypophysectomy
- Meningeal Neoplasms
- Meningioma
- Pituitary Neoplasms