Describing paraspinal EMG findings: inadequacy of the single 0-4+ score.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10744186.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Clinical electrodiagnostic textbooks instruct that lumbar radiculopathies typically have paraspinal abnormalities and that these abnormalities should be recorded using a single 0-4+ scale. Recent work demonstrates that that the innervation of the paraspinal muscles is segmental, not homogenous, and that asymptomatic persons may have reproducible ("1+") positive waves or fibrillation potentials. To assess current use of the 0-4+ scale, a retrospective study of EMG scores in persons diagnosed with radiculopathy at a university laboratory was performed. No specific paraspinal EMG technique was used. Included were 117 consecutive, qualified S-1 radiculopathies and 33 L-5 radiculopathies. When radiculopathy was defined by "more than one limb muscle abnormal," paraspinal scores were recorded as 0 to 1+ in 83% of L-5 and 63% of S-1 cases (chi2, L-5 vs. S-1, not significant). For more severe radiculopathies (at least one limb muscle with a "2+" score), 0-1+ paraspinal scores were recorded in 76% of L-5 and 57% of S-1 cases (chi2, not significant). A total of 82% of S-1 radiculopathies with no overlapping L-5 innervation had 0-1+ scores. These data demonstrate the common use of equivocal paraspinal scores in patients whom electromyographers believe have radiculopathies. Standardized exploration techniques and a more detailed scoring system for the paraspinal muscles may eliminate this discrepancy.
Medical subject headings
- Electromyography
- Low Back Pain
- Muscles
- Radiculopathy