An evaluation of hard palate mucosa graft as a lining material in alar reconstruction: a 7-year experience applied to the full-thickness alar defect.

Abstract

The authors present their experience with 25 hard palate mucosa grafts used as lining material in the reconstruction of full-thickness alar defects. Good "take" was obtained in 22 grafts; the other three grafts incurred necrosis of the overriding skin flaps and postoperative infection. Degree of shrinkage was 11 to 15 percent of grafted size in patients with the type of defect that did not include the alar margin; shrinkage was 26 to 35 percent in patients with the type that included more than 50 percent of the alar margin. In all patients who had a good graft take, the nasal cavities were maintained and there was no nasal obstruction or collapsing during strong breathing. The healing time of the palate donor site varied from 7 days to 5 weeks, depending on the size of the defect. No patients experienced any symptoms at the donor site after healing. The authors concluded that hard palate mucosa can be considered a useful material in alar reconstruction because of the ease in graft harvesting and its support features. When the defect is large enough to involve the total unilateral ala nasi, even though the degree of postoperative shrinkage is comparatively high, hard palate mucosa may be the most suitable material to ensure good take of the graft and less possibility of donor-site morbidity.