Patient satisfaction needs as related to knee stability and objective findings after ACL reconstruction using the LARS artificial ligament.

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to compare patient satisfaction with the objective measurement of knee stability and assess early complications following ACL reconstruction using a LARS artificial ligament. Forty-seven patients were reviewed 8-45 months after surgery. Assessment was made by the Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patient satisfaction, a modified International Knee Documentation Committee form for clinical knee stability, and a Telos stress radiography for PA stability. Complications were assessed at interview and were double-checked with charts. The LARS artificial ligament may be a safe device to reconstruct an ACL tear. Documenting mechanical stability of the knee is inadequate when reporting follow-up studies and a questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction should be added to provide a better picture of the outcome and results.