Eosinophilic lung diseases: diagnostic accuracy of thin-section CT in 111 patients.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10966710.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine whether various eosinophilic lung diseases can be differentiated by means of thin-section computed tomography (CT). Thin-section CT scans in 111 patients with eosinophilic lung diseases-40 with chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, 16 with Churg-Strauss syndrome, 16 with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), 13 with acute eosinophilic pneumonia, 12 with simple pulmonary eosinophilia, 11 with drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia, and three with hypereosinophilic syndrome-were assessed independently by two observers. The observers recorded the abnormalities, diagnosis, and degree of confidence in the diagnosis. The two observers made a correct first-choice diagnosis on average in 61% of readings. The correct diagnosis was made in 78% of cases of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia; 81%, acute eosinophilic pneumonia; 44%, Churg-Strauss syndrome; 84%, ABPA; 17%, simple pulmonary eosinophilia; 27%, drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia; and 33%, hypereosinophilic syndrome. The two observers made a correct diagnosis with a high degree of confidence in 36% of readings. There was moderate agreement between the observers for the correct diagnosis (kappa, 0.47) and for the correct diagnosis with a high degree of confidence (kappa, 0.59). Although eosinophilic lung diseases often can be differentiated by means of thin-section CT, correlation between CT findings and careful clinical evaluation are required for a definitive diagnosis.
Medical subject headings
- Image Enhancement
- Pulmonary Eosinophilia
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed