Development of intimal hyperplasia in six different vascular prostheses.
other
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10986022.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
to compare six vascular prostheses for the development of intimal hyperplasia (IH) in a sheep model. prostheses tested were gelatin sealed Dacron (GSD), fluoropassivated Dacron (FPD), FluroIpassiv TM (FD), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), carbon-lined expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (CL-ePTFE) and vascular access graft (VAG). Sixty-two adult female Merino sheep (35-45 kg) were used. Elliptical graft patches were implanted into the left common carotid artery using one of the six graft types: GSD (n=10), FPD (n=10), FD (n=12) VAG (n=10), ePTFE (n=10), or CL-ePTFE (n=10). Four weeks later grafts were removed for histopathological assessment and measurement of the degree of IH obtained on a computerised image analysis system. IH indices were significantly less for FPD (0.191+/-0.095, p<0.05), FD (0.199+/-0. 081, p<0.05), ePTFE (0.213+/-0.078, p<0.05) and CL-ePTFE (0.161+/-0. 066,p<0.01), compared to the GSD group (0.287+/-0.077). The VAG group (0.257+/-0.091) showed no difference compared to GSD. There was no significant difference between the FPD, FD, ePTFE and CL-ePTFE grafts. this study indicates that less IH occurred in the two-ePTFE grafts and two fluoropolymer coated Dacron grafts than in gelatin sealed Dacron or polyurethane grafts.
Medical subject headings
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis
- Tunica Intima