A continence index predicts the early return of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 10992373.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluated the ability of a newly developed continence index to predict the return of urinary continence 3 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed and used a continence index to determine continence level after removal of the urinary catheter on postoperative day 15 in 145 men. A total of 20 patients were evaluated independently by 2 nurse specialists to assess continence index reliability. We evaluated continence level, pad use and degree of bothersomeness due to incontinence 3 months after catheter removal. The association of continence score with outcome variables was calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel trend test and the predictive ability of the continence score was determined by logistic regression to produce cumulative odds ratios. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.995 for the independently assessed continence index ratings and the Cronbach coefficient alpha was 0.65 for the 5 continence index parameters. Complete continence or continence with heavy activity but not always was achieved by 96%, 85% and 68% of the men in tertiles 1 (continence score 18), 2 (continence score 15 to 17) and 3 (continence score 14 or less), respectively. The cumulative odds ratio of 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 to 4. 6) per tertile indicated a 2.9-fold increased chance of incontinence for each successively lower tertile. In addition, 96%, 82% and 68% of the men in tertiles 1 to 3, respectively, required no or 1 small pad daily. The cumulative odds ratio for pad use was 2.3 (95% CI 1.5 to 3.5) per tertile. Of the patients in tertiles 1 to 3 100%, 97% and 80%, respectively, had no or slight bothersomeness due to urinary incontinence. The cumulative odds ratio for bothersomeness level was 2.7 (95% CI 1.7 to 4.3) per tertile. The Mantel-Haenszel trend test showed a significant association of continence score with all 3 outcome variables (p < or =0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our continence index is a simple and reliable instrument that provides useful prognostic information on the early return of continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.