Preference-based health outcome measures in low back pain.

Abstract

Preference-based health outcome measures were considered in two settings. In the clinical context, utility assessment using the VAS, TTO or SG was described. It is recognized that formal utility assessment is generally not needed in day-to-day clinical practice. When the need to explicitly value alternative health outcomes arises, the VAS is recommended because of its ease of implementation. In the health policy context, preference classification systems are recommended for valuing health when a cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative health care interventions is planned. At present, there is little evidence to base choice of one system over another for assessing the cost-effectiveness of low back pain interventions.