Comparison of migration in modular sockets with ceramic and polyethylene inlays.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11144494.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study compared migration in 73 cementless total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with either alumina ceramic (n = 23) or polyethylene (n = 50) inlays; prosthesis sockets and stems were identical except for the inlays. After 7 years of follow-up, 5 sockets (4 with ceramic and 1 with polyethylene inlays) had been revised an average of 63.3 months (range: 49-81 months) after implantation, and survival analysis showed a significantly higher revision rate for sockets with ceramic inlays (89 +/- 6%) versus polyethylene inlays (98.2 +/- 1.7%) (P = .032). Migration analysis of the first three postoperative years revealed significantly higher vertical migration in sockets with ceramic inlays (P = .047), in patients aged <60 years (P = .02), and in osteoporotic type C bone (A versus C, P = .0071 and B versus C, P = .0004).
Medical subject headings
- Ceramics
- Foreign-Body Migration
- Hip Prosthesis
- Materials Testing
- Polyethylene
Anatomy
- hip