Buttressing the staple line in lung volume reduction surgery: a randomized three-center study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11156078.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The intention of buttressing the staple line in lung volume reduction surgery is to reduce air leaks and to shorten the hospital stay. A randomized three-center study was carried out to test this hypothesis. Sixty-five patients with a mean age of 59.2 +/- 1.2 years underwent bilateral lung volume reduction surgery by video-assisted thoracoscopy using endoscopic staplers (ET 45B; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) either without or with bovine pericardium for buttressing (Peri-Strips Dry; Bio-Vascular, Inc, Saint Paul, MN). There were no differences between the control and treatment groups in lung function, degree of dyspnea, and arterial blood gases before and 3 months after LVRS. Seven patients (3 in the treatment group) needed a reoperation because of persistent air leak. The median duration of air leaks was shorter in the treatment group (0.0 day [range, 0 to 28 days versus 4 days [range, 0 to 27 days); p < 0.001), confirmed by a shorter median drainage time in this group (5 days [range, 1 to 35 days] versus 7.5 days [range, 2 to 29 days); p = 0.045). Hospital stay was comparable between the two groups (9.5 days [range, 6 to 44 days] versus 12.0 days [range, 5 to 46 days]; p = 0.14). Buttressing the staple line significantly shortens the duration of air leaks and the drainage time. As hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups, cost-effectiveness may depend on the local situation.
Medical subject headings
- Pneumonectomy
- Pulmonary Emphysema
- Surgical Staplers
- Sutures