Propofol depressed neutrophil hydrogen peroxide production more than midazolam, whereas adhesion molecule expression was minimally affected by both anesthetics in rats with abdominal sepsis.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11159247.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The treatment of sepsis may require mechanical ventilation of the lungs and sedation. Because neutrophils are the most important effector cells for protecting against sepsis, and propofol and midazolam are the most widely used anesthetics for sedation, we studied the effects of these two anesthetics on the neutrophil function during sepsis. Sepsis was induced in rats by cecal ligation and puncture. At either 4 h or 24 h after cecal ligation and puncture, blood and peritoneal neutrophils were obtained, incubated with the test anesthetics, and the hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) production and CD11b/c expression were determined by flow cytometry. In both early (at 4 h) and late (at 24 h) sepsis, propofol and midazolam depressed H(2)O(2) production by blood and peritoneal neutrophils at clinical concentrations. Propofol caused more depression than midazolam (P < 0.005). In both early and late sepsis, the effect of the anesthetics on the up-regulation of the stimulation-induced CD11b/c expression on blood neutrophils was minimal at clinical concentrations. If these results ultimately become clinically relevant, midazolam may be preferable to propofol for sedation during sepsis.
Medical subject headings
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Hydrogen Peroxide
- Integrin alphaXbeta2
- Macrophage-1 Antigen
- Midazolam
- Neutrophils
- Propofol
- Sepsis