Clinical experience of patellar fracture fixation using metal wire or non-absorbable polyester--a study of 37 cases.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11223044.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The results of patellar fracture fixation using metal wire and non-absorbable polyester (5 Ethibond) are presented. In group 1 (21 cases), the standard "AO" technique using stainless steel wire was used, and in group 2 (16 cases) we used 5 Ethibond. Patients were assigned to the two groups on surgeon preference. Post-operative management in the two groups was similar, with patients being allowed to mobilise as comfort allowed, under the supervision of the physiotherapists. All patients were followed-up until union of the fractures or until further surgical intervention was carried out. At a mean of 2 years and 6 months (range 1-4 years), we reviewed the notes and X-rays of all 37 cases. In group 2 there were no cases of infection but there were three cases of post-operative infections in group 1. Re-operation rate was 6/21 (38%) in group 1 and 1/6 (6%) in group 2. Therefore, the relative risk of re-operation in the metal group is six times that in the non-absorbable polyester group. The risk of infection in the metal group is also higher. These have implication on patient morbidity associated with the operative treatment of patellar fractures. Non-absorbable polyester appears to compare favourably with the use of metallic wire to fix patellar fractures.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Wires
- Fracture Fixation, Internal
- Patella
- Polyethylene Terephthalates
- Sutures