Comparison of the posterior approach versus the dorsal approach in the treatment of congenital vertical talus.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11242252.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare retrospectively the results of a single-stage dorsal approach versus the posterior approach for the surgical treatment of congenital vertical talus (CVT) at a single institution. Twenty-four patients (33 feet) with CVT were treated surgically between 1960 and 1998. Eighteen patients (25 feet) underwent a posterior release (group 1), and six patients (eight feet) underwent surgery via the dorsal approach (group 2). All patients were evaluated at a minimal follow-up of 3 years. Preoperative and follow-up radiographs were evaluated, and a modified version of the clinical score by Adalaar was used. Group 1 had 45 procedures on 25 feet, whereas group 2 had no repeated or revision operations. The clinical score was 6.75 for group 1 and 8.0 for group 2. Tourniquet time was 123 minutes and 87 minutes for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Twelve group 1 patients (48%) had avascular necrosis (AVN) versus none of the group 2 patients. Both groups had similar preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements. Both approaches were able to reduce successfully the talonavicular joint; however, the single-stage dorsal incision group required significantly less operative time, had better clinical scores, and had fewer complications 3 years after surgery.
Medical subject headings
- Foot Deformities, Congenital
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Talus
Anatomy
- foot