Direct measurement of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol is more effective than total cholesterol for the purpose of lipoprotein screening.

Abstract

We have developed a new method for chemically measuring blood low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. In the present study, we simulated guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) using our LDL cholesterol measurements. Blood samples were collected from 1,069 individuals (519 males, 550 females) who were referred to our laboratory at Niigata University Hospital for lipoprotein analysis. LDL cholesterol levels were determined according to our assay protocol, which has been published previously. Subjects were categorized by NCEP guidelines and identified "false positives" and "false negatives" on the basis of LDL cholesterol levels measured by our method. The sensitivity of the NCEP guidelines is 87.5% and the specificity is 87.1%, provided we assume that every individual has fewer than two risk factors for coronary heart disease. If we assume that every individual has two or more risk factors, the sensitivity and specificity of the guidelines are 99 and 56.8%, respectively. This study presents an opportunity to reevaluate guidelines for routine lipoprotein screening. The chance that individuals with higher LDL cholesterol and lower high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol levels in serum would be missed at initial classification should be zero. The chance that individuals with desirable lipid levels would undergo further lipoprotein analysis should be decreased. Since the new method can be implemented cost-effectively in routine lipoprotein screening, direct measurement of LDL cholesterol could replace total cholesterol.