Comparison of metal versus absorbable implants in tension-band wiring: a preliminary study.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11332966.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The strength of tension-band wiring using bioabsorbable materials versus metal implants was assessed with a rabbit knee fusion model. Ten rabbit knees were osteotomized and rigidly fixed using a tension-band technique: five with metal implants (2 pins and 24-gauge wire) and five with absorbable implants (2-mm pins [Bionx, Blue Bell, Pa] and 1 Maxon [Davis and Geck, Danbury, Conn]). Biomechanical testing of the fixation strength was completed using a servohydraulic mechanical testing machine and a specifically designed four-point bending jig. The parameters assessed were maximal load, relative stiffness, displacement, and bending moment of the constructs. Results of the biomechanical testing showed no statistical difference between the constructs on any of the parameters assessed.
Medical subject headings
- Absorbable Implants
- Arthrodesis
- Bone Nails
- Bone Wires
- Prostheses and Implants