End-stage renal disease treatment: a European perspective.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11443769.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
There is presently much debate about the optimal flow chart of pre-end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and ESRD patients. This article summarizes two important nonmedical factors that affect the outcome of ESRD patients in Europe: late referral and the structure of the health care system. In a European survey, 30% of patients were referred to a nephrologist less than 1 mo before the start of renal replacement therapy (RRT). This had an impact on the modality choice, as 77.5% of late versus 51.1% of early referrals were started on hemodialysis. Hospitalization at start of RRT was longer in late versus early referrals (15.1 +/- 16.0 versus 27.8 +/- 23.7 d respectively, P < 0.001). There were more patients without antihypertensive medication in the late referral group (28.6% versus 15.5%, P = 0.004), and diastolic BP in this group was higher (83.5 +/- 15.8 versus 74.4 +/- 15.0 mmHg, P = 0.03). One year after the start of dialysis, the number of deaths in the late referrals was higher (26.7 versus 16.4%, P = 0.07) and the number of transplanted patients was lower (4.7 versus 17.5%, P = 0.02). Creatinine clearance at start of RRT was 7.0 +/- 3.5 ml/min in the patients who died during the first year after start of RRT versus 9.5 +/- 3.6 ml/min in those surviving. Only 18% of patients were started with a creatinine clearance > 10 ml/min, as recommended by the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines. It is concluded that late referral to a nephrologist is still a major problem that has a negative influence on modality choice for peritoneal dialysis, and on morbidity and mortality of ESRD patients.
Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
- Quality of Health Care