Amniotic membrane grafts, "fresh" or frozen? A clinical and in vitro comparison.
case_report · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11466241.
- Also identified by PMC identifier 1724096.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The use of "fresh" (hypothermically stored) and frozen amniotic membrane (AM) was compared in a patient with cicatricial pemphigoid with stem cell failure. The viability of both "fresh" and frozen AM epithelial cells was assessed after storage. AM was stored at either +4 degrees C ("fresh") or at -80 degrees C (frozen). A "fresh" graft was applied to the cornea following superficial keratectomy. Subsequently, a further frozen graft was applied to the same eye. Viability of the stored AM epithelium was assessed by investigating membrane integrity and mitochondrial activity. In both cases the cornea re-epithelialised and visual acuity improved. Improvement, however, was not sustained. Although both procedures led to an improvement in visual acuity, "fresh" tissue performed no better than frozen in promoting re-epithelialisation. The authors suggest that logistical, safety, and cost considerations outweigh any benefits of using "fresh" as opposed to frozen graft material.
Medical subject headings
- Amnion
- Corneal Diseases
- Cryopreservation
- Pemphigoid, Benign Mucous Membrane
- Transplantation, Heterotopic