Discharge disposition from acute care after traumatic brain injury: the effect of insurance type.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11552183.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine if persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who are insured by Medicaid or health maintenance organizations (HMOs) are more likely to receive postacute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) than in rehabilitation facilities, compared with persons insured by commercial fee-for-service (FFS) plans. Retrospective cohort study. County hospital admitting 30% of all Washington State TBI patients. Patients with moderate to severe TBI discharged to rehabilitation facilities or SNFs between 1992 and 1997 (n = 1271); 56.3% were insured by Medicaid, 26.1% by FFS plans, and 17.6% by HMOs. Not applicable. Disposition on discharge from acute care (rehabilitation facilities vs SNF); adjusted relative risk (RR) and confidence interval (CI) for different insurance types. After accounting for confounding factors, Medicaid patients were 68% more likely (RR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.34-2.11) and HMO patients were 23% more likely (RR = 1.23, 95% CI =.90-1.68) to go to a SNF than FFS patients. However, the latter difference was not statistically significant. An association exists between insurance type and postacute care site. Efforts should be made to determine the effect this relationship has on the cost and outcomes for TBI patients.
Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries
- Fee-for-Service Plans
- Health Maintenance Organizations
- Insurance Coverage
- Medicaid
- Patient Discharge
- Rehabilitation Centers
- Skilled Nursing Facilities
- Subacute Care