Intrapartum epidural catheter migration: a comparative study of three dressing applications.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11573633.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We compared three types of catheter fixation application for their ability to minimize the incidence and magnitude of epidural catheter movement during labour. Patients were randomized to have their epidural catheter secured by a Tegaderm dressing (group T; n = 35), a Tegaderm dressing plus filter-shoulder fixation (group F; n = 39), or a Niko Epi-Fix dressing (group N; n = 37). The length of catheter visible at the patient's skin surface was recorded (to the nearest 0.5 cm) after insertion and before removal; the difference was defined as 'catheter movement'. Outward movement of the catheter was greatest when a Niko Epi-Fix was used (P < 0.01). Concerning minimization of displacement of the epidural catheter per se, only a Tegaderm dressing with additional filter-shoulder fixation proved more effective than using a Niko Epi-Fix dressing (P < 0.05).
Medical subject headings
- Analgesia, Epidural
- Analgesia, Obstetrical
- Bandages
- Foreign-Body Migration
- Obstetric Labor Complications