Prospective evaluation of office-based parotid ultrasound.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11597013.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Differentiation of parotid neoplasms from extraparotid upper cervical lesions is difficult by physical examination. The purpose of this report is to identify the role of office-based parotid ultrasound (US) in the evaluation of periauricular masses. A prospective database including the results of physical examination, office-based US, and the corresponding pathology was reviewed. Soft-tissue US was performed with a 7.5-mHz parallel probe with biplanar imaging. Thirty-eight patients were evaluated over a 28-month period (mean age. 45 years; range, 23-78 years). US demonstrated a mass within the substance of the parotid (n = 23, 61%), outside the parotid (n = 11, 29%), or diffuse parotitis (n = 4, 10%). Intraparotid masses were preauricular (n = 14), postauricular (n = 5), or upper cervical (n = 4) and were solid (n = 22) or cystic (n = 1). Patients with solid intraparotid masses underwent superficial (n = 20) or total parotidectomy (n = 2). Benign (n = 19) and malignant (n = 3) solid parotid nodules had similar US features of hypoechogenicity with posterior enhancement. Indistinct margins were noted in 3 of 3 malignant lesions as well as 15 of 19 benign nodules (P = .9). Extraparotid masses were confirmed to be nodal disease on the basis of observation with resolution (n = 3), fine-needle aspiration (n = 6), or surgical removal (n = 2) (mean follow-up, 6 months). Surgical office-based parotid US can delineate the location of periauricular mass lesions relative to the parotid gland. Benign and malignant lesions have a similar sonographic appearance.
Medical subject headings
- Parotid Gland
- Parotid Neoplasms