Bone mineral density and body composition in boys with distal forearm fractures: a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry study.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11598596.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine whether boys with distal forearm fractures differ from fracture-free control subjects in bone mineral density (BMD) or body composition. A case-control study of 100 patients with fractures (aged 3 to 19 years) and l00 age-matched fracture-free control subjects was conducted. Weight, height, and body mass index were measured anthropometrically. BMD values and body composition were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. More patients than control subjects (36 vs l4) were overweight (body mass index >85th percentile for age, P <.001). Patients had lower areal (aBMD) and volumetric (BMAD) bone mineral density values and lower bone mineral content but more fat and less lean tissue than fracture-free control subjects. The ratios (95% CIs) for all case patients/control subjects in age and weight-adjusted data were ultradistal radius aBMD 0.94 (0.91-0.97); 33% radius aBMD 0.96 (0.93-0.98) and BMAD 0.95 (0.91-0.99); spinal L2-4 BMD 0.92 (0.89-0.95) and BMAD 0.92 (0.89-0.94); femoral neck aBMD 0.95 (0.92-0.98) and BMAD 0.95 (0.91-0.98); total body aBMD 0.97 (0.96-0.99), fat mass 1.14 (1.04-1.24), lean mass 0.96 (0.93-0.99), and total body bone mineral content 0.94 (0.91-0.97). Our results support the view that low BMC, aBMD, and BMAD values and high adiposity are associated with increased risk of distal forearm fracture in boys. This is a concern, given the increasing levels of obesity in children today.
Medical subject headings
- Absorptiometry, Photon
- Body Composition
- Bone Density
- Radius Fractures
- Ulna Fractures