Influence of bone environment on ceramic osteointegration in spinal fusion: comparison of bone-poor and bone-rich sites.

Abstract

Quantitative experimental data showed differences in bone quality and ceramic incorporation between bone-rich and bone-poor implantation sites. Bone in-growth was significantly lower for ceramic implanted at a lumbar intertransverse than a laminar site. Bone-marrow enrichment of the lumbar intertransverse site (regarded as bone-poor) greatly facilitated ceramic osteointegration. The vertebral interbody site, despite theoretical richness in osteogenic precursor cells, might be bone-poor at the time of grafting as compared to the reference iliac crest site. These data have important clinical implications concerning the potential benefit of enriching both bone-poor and bone-rich sites.