Varus and valgus flexion laxity of total knee alignment methods in loaded cadaveric knees.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 11795740.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Both total knee alignment methods, the anatomic and classic, seek to achieve stability in flexion and extension. However, posterior femoral condyle referencing (anatomic alignment) combined with perpendicular tibial resection (classic alignment) results in a 3 degree relative internal rotation of the femoral component with lateral joint opening. The current cadaver study investigated the influence of total knee alignment methods and femoral component malrotation (3 degrees and 6 degrees internal and external malrotation) on femorotibial laxity. Varus and valgus excursion tests were done at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees knee flexion under vertical loading conditions of 150 N. None of the alignments produced increased laxity in extension. The largest laxity was found on the varus test at 60 degrees flexion with the femoral component at 6 degrees internal rotation. A 3 degree internal rotation of the femoral component showed increased varus laxity only for the combined alignment method. This finding shows that the femoral component position of the combined alignment method is a 3 degree relative internal malrotation and that an additional internal malrotation may compromise varus stability. Posterior femoral condyle referencing did not provide proper femoral component rotation. A ligament tensor may be helpful in determining femoral component rotation after soft tissue release in extension is performed.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Joint Instability
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Range of Motion, Articular
Anatomy
- knee