Impact of treatment on the quality of life in patients with critical limb ischaemia.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12093063.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
the purpose of this study was to assess the quality of life (QOL) in patients with critical lower limb ischaemia (CLI), and its modification after three types of therapeutical outcomes. between January and December 2000 52 patients (36 male, mean age 68 years) treated for critical limb ischaemia (CLI) completed the Short Form (SF)-36 on admission and then 6 and 12 months later. Patients were divided in the 3 groups: Group I: revascularisation; Group II: major amputation; Group III: conservative treatment. Trends for each dimension over the follow-up and the effect of treatment group were assessed by an analysis of variance with repeated measurements. on admission, patients with CLI had a significantly worse health-related quality of life than a control population. Although some domains improved, some also deteriorated between baseline and 12 months and there was no significant difference between the three treatment groups. our results suggest that changes in dimensions of QOL obtained by limb revascularisation do not differ from those of other therapeutic approaches.
Medical subject headings
- Extremities
- Ischemia
- Quality of Life