A comparison of cemented and cementless titanium femoral components used for primary total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic and survivorship study.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12168174.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Titanium has a low modulus of elasticity that makes it an attractive metal for femoral hip components. We directly compared 2 similar titanium stems, one cemented (n = 102 hips) and the other cementless (n = 78 hips), controlling for the most important surgical variables. The average radiographic follow-up was 6.7 and 7.0 years. Osteolysis below the joint line, zones 2 through 6, was 12.7% (13 of 102) in the cemented group and 0% in the cementless group (P<.001). There were 17 acetabular revisions in each study group. The cementless group had no femoral revisions, whereas 9 acetabular revisions in the cemented group had a simultaneous femoral revision (P=.005). Survivorship, defined as revision of the femur, was 84% for the cemented group and 100% for the cementless group at 10 years. Cementless titanium stems are more resistant to osteolysis and mechanical failure compared with similar cemented titanium stems.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Cementation
- Hip Prosthesis
- Titanium
Anatomy
- femur
- hip