The choice of allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic transplantation for NHL.
Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12194722.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
NHL constitutes the sixth most common malignancy diagnosed in the USA every year, accounting for approximately 24,400 deaths. Although a subset of patients can be cured with chemotherapy or radiation therapy, the outlook is generally poor for patients with refractory or recurrent disease. High-dose therapy supported by both autologous and allogeneic transplantation has been widely studied in this group of patients. Autologous transplantation may be considered standard therapy for patients with diffuse large-cell NHL in chemotherapy-sensitive relapse. Selected categories of patients with other histologic subtypes may also benefit from this strategy. Allogeneic transplantation using high-dose myeloablative conditioning regimen is an effective, yet hazardous approach. A GvL effect leads to a lower rate of disease recurrence than occurs with autologous transplants, but this benefit is offset by higher risk of treatment related mortality. The recent use of less toxic non-myeloablative conditioning regimens for allogeneic transplantation has reduced the risk of transplant-related mortality, allowing this approach even in older or medically infirm patients. Nonablative allogeneic transplants are a promising strategy, particularly for patients with indolent lymphoid malignancies.
Medical subject headings
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
- Transplantation Conditioning