Prick tests to aeroallergens: is it possible simply to wipe the device between tests?
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12269942.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Improperly performed skin prick tests (SPT) can lead to wrong allergy diagnosis and incorrect treatment. To overcome false-positive results it is recommended to change the puncture device between each test, although very few studies have examined the real drawbacks (false-positives) and advantages (time and cost savings) of using only one device. Two groups of 20 patients with rhinitis or asthma, sensitized to either house-dust mites or grass pollens, had successive serial SPT to 9% codeine phosphate and the relevant allergen using the same needle or lancet, wiped between each test. With both the needle and the lancet, there were 12.5-67.5% false-positive results using the house-dust mite or grass pollen allergen extracts, respectively. There were no false-positive results with the 9% codeine phosphate. Our study shows that this technique is not reliable as it provoked an unacceptable number of false-positive results.
Medical subject headings
- Air Pollutants
- Allergens
- Antigens, Dermatophagoides
- Skin Tests