Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention--effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12430114.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention (UR) may depend on the anesthetic technique. We therefore reviewed available published studies of UR in relation to anesthetic technique. A Medline-based search (1966-November 2001) revealed 70 nonrandomized and 2 randomized studies. The incidence of UR was lower with local anesthesia (LA) (33 in 8991 patients, 0.37%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24%-0.49%) compared with regional anesthesia (RA) (150 in 6191 patients, 2.42%, 95% CI 2.04%-2.81%) and general anesthesia (GA) (344 in 11471 patients, 3.00%, 95% CI 2.69%-3.31%). The low incidence of UR with LA is in accordance with the inhibitory effects of RA and GA on bladder function. Data from newer short-acting techniques of GA and RA are required to define the optimal anesthetic for inguinal herniorrhaphy.
Medical subject headings
- Anesthesia
- Hernia, Inguinal
- Postoperative Complications
- Urinary Retention