Stiffness characteristics of composite hybrid external fixators.

Abstract

New composite hybrid fixators for fracture stabilization using single or multiple rings with monolateral bars and half-pin fixation may provide clinical advantages such as reduced bulk and easier skin access. However, the mechanical properties of these fixators are difficult to estimate from numerous design parameters. Addressing this problem the following research questions were asked: (1) Do composite hybrid fixators have similar stiffness properties to clinically proven triple-ring fixators; (2) How does the fixation mechanism affect the stiffness properties of external fixators, and, (3) Are there interferences between ring number and fixation method? An experimental study was done on simulated metaphyseal tibial fractures and stiffness of 12 fixators was measured for different loading conditions. The results showed that triple-ring fixators provide approximately 20% stiffer properties than double-ring and single-ring fixators. No influence of ring number on the AP bending properties was found and different fixation methods were associated with large differences in fixator stiffness, whereas significant interferences were found between ring number and fixation method. Although the mechanical properties investigated in the current study cannot predict directly the clinical performance of these fixators, the stiffness data provide useful information for making decisions regarding the treatment of fractures using external fixation.