What to do for prostate cancer patients with a rising PSA?--A survey of Australian practice.

Duchesne, Gillian M; Millar, Jeremy L; Moraga, Vladimir; Rosenthal, Mark; Royce, Peter; Snow, Ross · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys · 2003

cross_sectional · Level IV

Where this comes from

Abstract

To document current Australian management of asymptomatic prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse after radical treatment or considered unsuitable for radical treatment. Four case scenarios-postprostatectomy PSA relapse, postradiotherapy (RT) with a slow or a rapidly rising PSA level, or no radical treatment-were presented. Management preferences, including (where relevant) RT, androgen ablation either immediate or delayed until a PSA rise or symptomatic progression, and other approaches, were identified. The preferred methods of androgen ablation were noted. One hundred eighteen informative replies out of 324 e-mailed surveys were received. For postprostatectomy PSA relapse, 59% of respondents favored salvage RT. For post-RT with a slow or a rapidly rising PSA level and treatment of nonradical patients, there was no clear consensus of opinion, with respondents divided among the different options. A diverse range of PSA levels was cited for delayed intervention, with values ranging from 0.8 to 100 ng/mL. PSA doubling time proved a more consistent criterion for determining intervention. Most respondents favored the use of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist as first-line androgen ablation, although patient choice was recognized as important in all decision making. A lack of available evidence underlies the diversity of opinion regarding the management of asymptomatic prostate cancer patients with a rising PSA. The need for randomized controlled trials in this area is highlighted.

Medical subject headings