Morphology of ileal and jejunal pouches used as rectal substitutes.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12626914.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Our aim was to determine whether the mucosa of a canine jejunal pouch used as a rectal substitute after proctocolectomy retains its morphologic features better than the mucosa of a canine ileal pouch so used. Among ten dogs that underwent proctocolectomy, five had a jejunal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis and five an ileal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis. After six months, the animals were killed, the intestinal pouches and portions of unaltered distal ileum were removed, and a blinded, mucosal morphometric analysis was performed. The mucosa of the jejunal pouches had an overall thickness (mean +/- standard deviation, anterior and posterior walls, 1,300 +/- 140 microm), villous height (286 +/- 46 microm), and crypt depth (790 +/- 77 microm) greater than that of the ileal pouches (920 +/- 170, 208 +/- 47, and 530 +/- 130 microm, respectively; P < 0.05). Moreover, the mucosal thickness of the jejunal pouches was similar to that of the distal ileum proximal to the pouch (1,200 +/- 200 microm; P > 0.05), whereas the mucosal thickness of the ileal pouch was thinner (P < 0.05). The jejunal mucosa retains its major morphometric features when the jejunum is used as a rectal substitute after proctocolectomy. In contrast, the ileal mucosa atrophies when the ileum is so used.
Medical subject headings
- Colonic Pouches
- Intestinal Mucosa
- Proctocolectomy, Restorative