Postinduction video-mediastinoscopy is as accurate and safe as video-mediastinoscopy in patients without pretreatment for potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12683545.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Prospective assessment of accuracy and safety of video-mediastinoscopy (VMS) in patients without pretreatment and those after induction therapy for potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer. Between 1996 and 1999, 219 patients underwent VMS at our institution: 195 patients without pretreatment and 24 after completion of induction therapy. Mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected and biopsied according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) lymph node mapping system using a video-assisted approach. The accuracy of VMS was assessed for each patient according to the results obtained from mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) performed during lung resection. Video-mediastinoscopy in patients without pretreatment revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy as compared with MLND of 87%, 100%, and 95.6%, respectively, and a procedure-related complication rate of 4% (8/195 patients). Video-mediastinoscopy in patients after induction therapy revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 81%, 100%, and 91% as compared with MLND, without apparent complications. Video-mediastinoscopy performed after induction therapy for non-small cell lung cancer is as accurate as mediastinoscopy in patients without pretreatment and did not confer additional morbidity.
Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Lung Neoplasms
- Mediastinoscopy
- Neoplasm Staging
- Video Recording