Myocardial viability in chronic ischemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Abstract

We sought to compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI) with nuclear metabolic imaging for the assessment of myocardial viability in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Contrast-enhanced MRI has been shown to identify scar tissue in ischemically damaged myocardium. Twenty-six patients with chronic coronary artery disease and LV dysfunction (mean ejection fraction 31 +/- 11%) underwent (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), technetium-99m tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and ceMRI. In a 17-segment model, the segmental extent of hyperenhancement (SEH) by ceMRI, defined as the relative amount of contrast-enhanced tissue per myocardial segment, was compared with segmental FDG and tetrofosmin uptake by PET and SPECT. In severely dysfunctional segments (n = 165), SEH was 9 +/- 14%, 33 +/- 25% (p < 0.05), and 80 +/- 23% (p < 0.05) in segments with normal metabolism/perfusion, metabolism/perfusion mismatch, and matched defects, respectively. Segmental glucose uptake by PET was inversely correlated to SEH (r = -0.86, p < 0.001). By receiver operator characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.95 for the differentiation between viable and non-viable segments. At a cutoff value of 37%, SEH optimally differentiated viable from non-viable segments defined by PET. Using this threshold, the sensitivity and specificity of ceMRI to detect non-viable myocardium as defined by PET were 96% and 84%, respectively. Contrast-enhanced MRI allows assessment of myocardial viability with a high accuracy, compared with FDG-PET, in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and LV dysfunction.