Orthopaedic crossfire--Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12730940.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Numerous options are available for femoral stem fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty, including cemented stems, proximally-coated cementless stems, extensively coated cementless stems, impaction grafting cemented stems, and modular cementless stems. In terms of versatility, ease of insertion, use with an extended trochanteric osteotomy, and clinical results, extensively coated cementless stems remain the gold standard. Modular cementless stems have not matched the clinical results of extensively coated cementless stems. In addition, modular stems introduce increased complexity, cost, and potential complications and are therefore, rarely, if ever, necessary in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Prosthesis
Anatomy
- hip