Orthopaedic crossfire--Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in opposition.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12730941.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
If distal fixation is a goal in revision hip surgery, then modularity may not be necessary. If, however, proximal fixation is desired, both proximal and distal fit and fill are necessary to achieve initial stability. This can only be done in the revision situation by using a modular stem. Long-term follow up of 320 revision cases treated using a proximally modular proximal ingrowth stem shows a re-revision rate for late aseptic loosening of 0.93% at a mean time of 7 years, indicating that such a stem is a reasonable option.
Medical subject headings
- Hip Prosthesis
Anatomy
- hip