Kinematics of three variations of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee prosthesis.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12771835.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The effect of changes in the articulating surfaces on the kinematics of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee replacement was evaluated. Twenty-two patients (22 knees) (median age, 69 years) were randomized to a standard design with a fixed polyethylene bearing, a design with a mobile bearing, or a new design with a spherical medial femoral condyle with a fixed bearing. The patients were studied with radiostereometry and film-exchangers at 0 degrees nonweightbearing and during active weightbearing extension from 45 degrees to 15 degrees. The center of the tibial tray with a mobile-bearing prosthesis occupied a more anterior position than observed in the designs with a fixed bearing. The medial femoral condyle center had a more posterior position in the standard design than in the design with a spherical medial condyle. From a distally displaced position at 45 degrees, the medial condylar center displaced a mean of 1.8 mm proximally during extension in the standard design and had a constant position in the meniscal design. In the spherical design the medial condyle was displaced proximally at 45 degrees and displaced a mean of 1.6 mm distally during extension. The reduced anteroposterior and proximodistal translations in the meniscal design are compatible with improved congruency between the components. The design with a spherical medial condyle stabilized anteroposterior motions, but showed more pronounced proximodistal displacement medially than did the other two designs.
Medical subject headings
- Knee Prosthesis
Anatomy
- knee