Bioabsorbable miniplating versus metallic fixation for metacarpal fractures.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12771846.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Bioabsorbable implants offer an attractive alternative to metallic implants to stabilize small bone fractures in the hand. Self-reinforced bioabsorbable miniplating for metacarpal fractures was studied in bones from cadavers and compared with standard metallic fixation methods. One hundred twelve fresh-frozen metacarpals from humans had three-point bending and torsional loading after transverse osteotomy followed by fixation using seven methods: (1) dorsal and (2) dorsolateral 2-mm self-reinforced polylactide-polyglycolide 80/20 plating, (3) dorsal and (4) dorsolateral 2-mm self-reinforced poly-L/DL-lactide 70/30 plating, (5) dorsal 1.7-mm titanium plating, (6) dorsal 2.3-mm titanium plating, and (7) crossed 1.25-mm Kirschner wires. In apex dorsal and palmar bending, dorsal self-reinforced polylactide-polyglycolide and poly-L/DL-lactide plates provided stability comparable with dorsal titanium 1.7-mm plating. When the bioabsorbable plates were applied dorsolaterally, apex palmar rigidity was increased and apex dorsal rigidity was decreased. Bioabsorbable platings resulted in higher torsional rigidity than 1.7-mm titanium plating and in failure torque comparable with 2.3-mm titanium plating. Low-profile selfreinforced polylactide-polyglycolide and poly-L/DL-lactide miniplates provide satisfactory biomechanical stability for metacarpal fixation. These findings suggest that bioabsorbable miniplating can be used safely in the clinical stabilization of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.
Medical subject headings
- Absorbable Implants
- Bone Plates
- Metacarpus
Anatomy
- hand