The use of bioelectric impedance analysis to measure fluid compartments in subjects with chronic paraplegia.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12808538.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of body mass index (BMI) as a surrogate marker of obesity in individuals with chronic paraplegia and to validate bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) as a method of measuring body composition in this group. Cross-sectional study. University hospital. Convenience sample of 31 subjects with paraplegia (19 men, 12 women; mean age, 34.2+/-8.8y) and 62 able-bodied control subjects (30 men, 32 women; mean age, 28.6+/-7.2y). Not applicable. Total-body water (TBW) by deuterium dilution; extracellular water (ECW) by corrected bromide space. Fat-free mass (FFM)=TBW/.732; fat mass (FM)=weight-FFM. Single-frequency whole-body and segmental BIA, and multifrequency whole-body BIA. BMI had 100% specificity and 20% sensitivity in distinguishing obese from nonobese subjects with paraplegia. TBW was predicted by using the equation: TBW (inL)=2.11-0.1age+3.45sex+.34wt+.28(ht(2)/R)-.086sex x wt(r(2)=.95, standard error of the estimate [SEE]=1.86L, P<.0001). This equation had 81.8% specificity and 68.4% sensitivity. ECW was predicted by using the equation: ECW (in L)=-.025+1.03sex+.187wt+.0041(ht(2)/X(c)) -.033sex x wt (r(2)=.75, SEE=1.62L, P<.0001). Multifrequency BIA offered no greater prediction of TBW or ECW than single-frequency BIA. BMI has excellent specificity but poor sensitivity in distinguishing obese from nonobese individuals with paraplegia. TBW (and therefore FFM and FM) and ECW can be reasonably well predicted by using single-frequency BIA.
Medical subject headings
- Body Fluid Compartments
- Body Mass Index
- Electric Impedance
- Obesity
- Paraplegia