Patients' perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy: systematic review.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12816822.
- Also identified by PMC identifier 162130.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To ascertain patients' views on the benefits of and possible memory loss from electroconvulsive therapy. Descriptive systematic review. Psychinfo, Medline, Web of Science, and Social Science Citation Index databases, and bibliographies. Articles with patients' views after treatment with electroconvulsive therapy. 26 studies carried out by clinicians and nine reports of work undertaken by patients or with the collaboration of patients were identified; 16 studies investigated the perceived benefit of electroconvulsive therapy and seven met criteria for investigating memory loss. The studies showed heterogeneity. The methods used were associated with levels of perceived benefit. At least one third of patients reported persistent memory loss. The current statement for patients from the Royal College of Psychiatrists that over 80% of patients are satisfied with electroconvulsive therapy and that memory loss is not clinically important is unfounded.
Medical subject headings
- Attitude to Health
- Electroconvulsive Therapy
- Memory Disorders