When should a synthetic casting material be used in preference to plaster-of-Paris? A cost analysis and guidance for casting departments.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1286908.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
An accurate cost analysis of the use of one of the new synthetic casting materials (Cellacast) compared with plaster-of-Paris (Gypsona) was undertaken over a 3-month period in the fracture clinic of Cardiff Royal Infirmary. The mean duration of usage before failure for synthetic forearm, scaphoid and below-knee casts was found to be approximately twice that of plaster casts. The use of synthetic casting materials was found to be cost-effective in situations where there was thought to be a high probability that structural failure of the cast would occur. Guidelines for the use of plaster-of-Paris and synthetic casting materials are presented.
Medical subject headings
- Casts, Surgical
- Equipment and Supplies, Hospital